Jack Anthrop vs Matt Kuhar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 10:20 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Anthrop vs M. Kuhar

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Anthrop 1 - 0 Kuhar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jack Anthrop winning 2 and Matt Kuhar winning 0. The last match between Jack Anthrop and Matt Kuhar was at the M15 Winston-Salem, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jack Anthrop getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anthrop | 1 |
| Kuhar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Winston-Salem(10-01-25)
J. Anthrop vs M. Kuhar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.76% (44-41) | Career Total W/L | 55.44% (107-86) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Anthrop vs M. Kuhar Match Preview:
- Matt Kuhar recently won 42.86% of points on his second serve, outperforming Jack Anthrop's 37.82%. Could this give Kuhar an opportunity to dominate in service games? Indeed, this advantage is predictive of match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning opponents' serves, Kuhar captures 51.70% of points on second serves, while Anthrop claims 46.15%. For first serve returns, Kuhar leads with 31.59% compared to Anthrop's 27.24%. These figures suggest an edge for Kuhar in return games.
- Under pressure, Anthrop excels in saving break points at 53.15%, better than Kuhar's 46.21%. How might this influence in-game scenarios? Anthrop could be more resilient when facing break points.
- Kuhar has a 46.81% win rate over the past year, whereas Anthrop boasts a higher 57.14% win rate. Can match experience be advantageous? Yes, Anthrop's winning streak suggests potential dominance.
- Both players excel on hard courts with a win percentage of 58%, but Kuhar struggles on clay (44%), while Anthrop has an even lower win rate at 20%.
- Kuhar participates frequently in $10K events, winning 47.50% of matches, contrasting with Anthrop's 60.00% win rate in similar competitions. Does this indicate a difference in readiness? Anthrop might be better prepared against varied competition.
- Regarding opponent caliber, Kuhar has faced players with an average rank of 425.68, while Anthrop has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 300.62. Is facing stronger opponents advantageous? Anthrop may have a competitive edge from this experience.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Anthrop's winning rate of 40% is superior to Kuhar's 25%, hinting at a greater likelihood of victory in such scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
In light of recent performance metrics, Matt Kuhar shows proficiency in both service and return games, especially with his superior second serve success rate and return statistics.
Jack Anthrop's ability to save breakpoints and slightly more impressive recent match win percentage indicate resilience and potential in pressure situations.
Overall, Anthrop's experience against higher-ranked opponents and better performance in deciding sets position him as a stronger candidate in tightly contested situations.
Considering these factors, Jack Anthrop emerges as the likely winner in the forthcoming tennis encounter, primarily due to his adaptability and experience against formidable opponents.
Jack Anthrop vs Matt Kuhar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Anthrop vs M. Kuhar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:37:6 | Average Match Time | 1:37:6 |
| 65% (34/52) | 1st Serve % | 69% (44/64) |
| 74% (25/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 53% (34/64) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Anthrop Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
M. Kuhar Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(6) 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||

J. Anthrop vs M. Kuhar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.76% (44/41) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.44% (107/86) |
| 52.60% (101/91) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.17% (240/195) |
| 51.04% (906/869) | Games Win/Loss | 52.87% (2126/1895) |
| 51.92% (27/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.34% (82/61) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 57.14% (16/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 257 | Aces Total | 340 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 113 | Total Double Faults | 425 |
| 1:35:5 | Average Match Time | 1:6:23 |
| 462.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.19 |
| 67% (3413/5126) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4950/7838) |
| 68% (2307/3413) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3200/4950) |
| 49% (838/1713) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1346/2888) |
| 42% (226/535) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (341/756) |
| 41% (2108/5128) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3201/7935) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Challenger W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 52.63% (40/36) | Futures W/L | 56.67% (102/78) |
| 51% (43/84) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (105/191) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (9/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 39% (9/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (21/47) |
| 83% (46/38) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (109/99) |
| 17% (46/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (109/10) |
| 15% (39/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (84/8) |